From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-16 07:00:18 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.hispeed.ch!not-for-mail
From: Gautier Write-only <gautier@fakeaddress.nil>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:59:57 +0100
Organization: Cablecom Newsserver
Message-ID: <3FB790ED.AE992406@fakeaddress.nil>
References: <bebbba07.0311081140.e0e94e6@posting.google.com>
 <bebbba07.0311102320.7fba665a@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbr17j1.1qo.randhol+valid for reply from news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <boq8bm$1g79l6$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311111235.e74c902@posting.google.com>
 <bormns$1i4d87$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <3FB1609E.D56E315C@fakeaddress.nil>
 <borog2$1fpdhl$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311122326.690bd121@posting.google.com>
 <bp0nqn$afi$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <bebbba07.0311132145.58a4541e@posting.google.com>
 <bp22op$1ltd$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> <3FB65716.85E1F775@fakeaddress.nil>
 <1IKdnYIxfIidWSui4p2dnA@comcast.com> <Ld6dndjIC6BKTSuiRVn-uA@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dclient217-162-142-125.hispeed.ch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: newshispeed.ch 1068994813 27510 217.162.142.125 (16 Nov 2003 15:00:13
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@hispeed.ch
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:00:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2544
Date: 2003-11-16T15:59:57+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Robert I. Eachus wrote:
> > Wow! That was fast, my code sample was only up for a short time and at
> > least two bug reports resulted.  I used to say that I had two modes of
> > writing Ada, in one I expected to write tens of thousands of lines
> > between compiler bug reports.  In the language lawyer mode, if I didn't
> > generate one bug report per every twenty lines or so, I was slacking.

Wes Groleau:


> However, it wasn't your sample that found the bug.
> 
> You posted
> 
>    package body Outer is
>      use Inner;
> 
> He changed it to
> 
>    use Outer.Inner;
>    package body Outer is

Thank you for the precision.

I'm curious to know who's right on the changed example: GNAT or ObjectAda ?
GNAT compiles, OA says:

outer.adb: Error: line 1 col 6 LRM:4.1(3), Direct name, Outer, is not visible, Ignoring future references 

________________________________________________________
Gautier  --  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm

NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!