From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-16 02:42:27 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.hispeed.ch!not-for-mail
From: Gautier Write-only <gautier@fakeaddress.nil>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 11:41:29 +0100
Organization: Cablecom Newsserver
Message-ID: <3FB75459.B0530C17@fakeaddress.nil>
References: <bebbba07.0311081140.e0e94e6@posting.google.com> for reply from
 news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no> <boq8bm$1g79l6$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311111235.e74c902@posting.google.com>
 <bormns$1i4d87$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <3FB1609E.D56E315C@fakeaddress.nil>
 <borog2$1fpdhl$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311122326.690bd121@posting.google.com>
 <bp0nqn$afi$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <bebbba07.0311132145.58a4541e@posting.google.com>
 <bp22op$1ltd$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <bebbba07.0311141523.3c523f8c@posting.google.com>
 <G-udnYiJ3bOJ2SuiRVn-tg@comcast.com> <3FB6513B.DA6E53CA@fakeaddress.nil>
 <X7idnWUKxp8GIyuiRVn-vg@comcast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dclient217-162-142-125.hispeed.ch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: newshispeed.ch 1068979304 18779 217.162.142.125 (16 Nov 2003 10:41:44
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@hispeed.ch
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 10:41:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2537
Date: 2003-11-16T11:41:29+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert I. Eachus

> As I said, not a problem, go ahead and push for "with and use" if you
> like it.  But having a use imply a with breaks things.  That model could
> be fixed, but why even try.  If you currently have a text editor macro
> that maps #wau Foo into "with Foo; use Foo;" you can change it to
> generate "with and use Foo;" if the change is approved.  I don't see it
> as a big deal, but different opinions are allowed and expected.

OK, you convinced me that the "use" implying "with", although looking nicer,
will cause a lot of problems, to begin with the non-compatibility and ambivalency.
I'll keep on pushing for "with and use".

________________________________________________________
Gautier  --  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm

NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!