From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-11 14:20:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.hispeed.ch!not-for-mail From: Gautier Write-only Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Clause "with and use" Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 23:20:14 +0100 Organization: Cablecom Newsserver Message-ID: <3FB1609E.D56E315C@fakeaddress.nil> References: <3FACCBFB.9D288CF2@fakeaddress.nil> <3FAF8C99.5040201@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dclient217-162-142-84.hispeed.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: newshispeed.ch 1068589227 21212 217.162.142.84 (11 Nov 2003 22:20:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@hispeed.ch NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:20:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2379 Date: 2003-11-11T23:20:14+01:00 List-Id: > >This is amazing. My analogy was between redundant "with/use" clauses > >and clutter in the front yard of a house for sale. Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler: > For *sale*. Exactly. BTW, I still don't understand what is redundant > on with and use. I don't use "use" (well, at least not globally). In this case, effectively, you are not likely to see a redundance. In your place I wouldn't worry at all about this proposal. ________________________________________________________ Gautier -- http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!