From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-03 14:11:06 PST
Message-ID: <3FA6D275.924D5750@fakeaddress.nil>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:11:01 +0100
From: Gautier Write-only <gautier@fakeaddress.nil>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
References: <3FA2CDCB.500F4AF0@fakeaddress.nil>
 <bebbba07.0310312309.77c6d82f@posting.google.com> <uism44c1k.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <3FA3B412.AF3BEB96@fakeaddress.nil> <uekwr4u1k.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <Ve5pb.36825$294.35899@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>
 <bebbba07.0311022159.345d7cab@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbqcpnq.eeq.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.90.97
X-Trace: news.swissonline.ch 1067897466 80.218.90.97 (3 Nov 2003 23:11:06
 +0200)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@swissonline.ch
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.nacamar.de!news.belwue.de!irazu.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.swissonline.ch!not-for-mail
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2013
Date: 2003-11-03T23:11:01+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> > OK, I think I'm starting to get it. Redundant keystrokes are what make
> > Ada the great language it is! I guess I was just too stubborn to see
> > that sooner. Now that I see the light, let me propose a way to use
> > even more redundant keystrokes:

Preben Randhol:

> No, you will never get it. Try read the design goals 10 more times and
> perhaps you will finally understand the points about readability versus
> writeability.

They are not always opposed. IMHO with this proposal (whatever form it
takes: "with and use" or "use" with implicit "with") you will gain
in readability _and_ writeability.

________________________________________________________
Gautier  --  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm

NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!