From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-03 14:07:58 PST
Message-ID: <3FA6D1B8.99409571@fakeaddress.nil>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:07:52 +0100
From: Gautier Write-only <gautier@fakeaddress.nil>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
References: <3FA2CDCB.500F4AF0@fakeaddress.nil>
 <1tbcqv03boka8k4dirujrrfbepc2cbvscu@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.90.97
X-Trace: news.swissonline.ch 1067897277 80.218.90.97 (3 Nov 2003 23:07:57
 +0200)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@swissonline.ch
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!irazu.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.swissonline.ch!not-for-mail
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2012
Date: 2003-11-03T23:07:52+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov:

> There was a [simpler / better] proposal that:
> 
> use A.B.C.D;
> 
> implies:
> 
> with A.B.C.D;

Effectively, this is overall simpler and better (for the user
as well as the underlying rules).

> It was rejected. Does anybody remember why?

I am curious to know!

________________________________________________________
Gautier  --  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm

NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!