From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-01 08:23:23 PST Message-ID: <3FA3DDF8.6C9539EF@fakeaddress.nil> Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 17:23:20 +0100 From: Gautier Write-only X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Clause "with and use" References: <3FA2CDCB.500F4AF0@fakeaddress.nil> <3FA3B796.EA1CAB99@fakeaddress.nil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.90.97 X-Trace: news.swissonline.ch 1067703803 80.218.90.97 (1 Nov 2003 17:23:23 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@swissonline.ch Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed.tiscali.ch!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!130.59.10.21.MISMATCH!irazu.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.swissonline.ch!not-for-mail Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1905 Date: 2003-11-01T17:23:20+01:00 List-Id: > > "with and use A[,B]" is exactly as if "with A[,B]; use A[,B]" was written. > > In your example, "with and use Parent.Child;" will naturally mean > > "with Parent; with Parent.Child; use Parent.Child;". Marius Amado Alves: > This is not an example of the proposed rule is it? Where does "with > Parent;" come from? The "with Parent;" is implicit, I should have mentioned. Just like a written "with Parent.Child;" means "with Parent; with Parent.Child;" in Ada95. ________________________________________________________ Gautier -- http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!