From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,15ce2ff6360d2b58
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-19 09:17:29 PST
Message-ID: <3F6975A3.1DD1@mail.ru>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:06:43 +0400
From: Dmytry Lavrov <m31415@mail.ru>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Newbie question:procedural variables(call by reference)?
References: <3F65EBF4.7CF3@mail.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.248.15.33
X-Trace: shknews01 1063875786 213.248.15.33 (18 Sep 2003 17:03:06 +0800)
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!sea-feed.news.verio.net!bassoon.i-cable.com!news.newttidc.com!news2.ilink.net!shknews01
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42689
Date: 2003-09-18T13:06:43+04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Thanks,

i found that i misunderstand sentence
like "without procedural variables we can ........ at compile time"
(in context of "without pointer arifmetics ....")