From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,15ce2ff6360d2b58
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-15 11:50:03 PST
Message-ID: <3F6609D9.8BB5E0BD@fakeaddress.nil>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:50:01 +0200
From: Gautier Write-only <gautier@fakeaddress.nil>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Newbie question:procedural variables(call by reference)?
References: <3F65EBF4.7CF3@mail.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.91.226
X-Trace: news.swissonline.ch 1063651801 80.218.91.226 (15 Sep 2003 20:50:01
 +0200)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@swissonline.ch
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsmi-us.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!news.mailgate.org!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.swissonline.ch!not-for-mail
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42540
Date: 2003-09-15T20:50:01+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmytry Lavrov:

> There are no procedural variables(calls by reference) in ADA,right?(or i
> missed something...).

I'm afraid you did ;-) : a small example (see the "My_feedback'access" etc.):
  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/uza_html/unzipada__adb.htm#23_3

> How to live without 'em? (i guess , 'like in java' ;-)

You can also use the genericity (no bad jokes with pointers), see e.g.
"procedure Count_files..." there:
  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/uza_html/comp_zip__adb.htm#108_13

Now you have to choose between TWO methods!
________________________________________________________
Gautier  --  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm

NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!