From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3cd3b8571c28b75f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1067ce,c3fb2e547555e41a X-Google-Attributes: gid1067ce,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-12 05:21:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsmi-us.news.garr.it!newsmi-eu.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!newsserver.cilea.it!news.crs4.it!not-for-mail From: Jacob Sparre Andersen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,alt.os.multics Subject: Re: A Customer's Request For Open Source Software Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:21:40 +0200 Organization: CRS4, Center for Adv. Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia Message-ID: <3F61BA54.9060702@crs4.it> References: <3F4828D9.8050700@attbi.com> <3F4EA616.30607@attbi.com> <3F512BD1.8010402@attbi.com> <3F52AA5F.8080607@attbi.com> <3F53B88E.7040405@attbi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: sparre.crs4.it Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: pietro.crs4.it 1063364730 25023 156.148.70.170 (12 Sep 2003 11:05:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@nntpserver.crs4.it. NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Sep 2003 11:05:30 GMT User-Agent: Any Browser, HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.0 X-Accept-Language: fo, da, no, sv, is, fr, de, it, In-Reply-To: Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42408 alt.os.multics:2011 Date: 2003-09-12T11:05:30+00:00 List-Id: Christopher Browne wrote: > The world rejoiced as "Robert I. Eachus" wrote: >>Alexander Kopilovitch wrote: [ viewing CPU's as just another resource ] > That can only conceivably be supported on hardware that conciously > supports adding and dropping CPUs while the system is "hot." I am not sure I agree with you on this point. I beleive that MOSIX actually allows you to do something like that, although the units you add or drop are whole physical machines and not just single CPU's or memory blocks. > But mandating an OS design that mandates this > "many-times-more-expensive" sort of hardware in days when > over-the-counter hardware is so cheap and available seems almost as > limiting as the lack of an "adding CPUs" feature. If it is sufficient to be able to add or drop physical machines from a networked cluster of machines that make up the Multics site, then I don't see it as a problem. Jacob -- "We will be restoring normality as soon as we are sure what is normal anyway."