From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,23cf9f1e93744eed
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-04 20:32:19 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!harp.news.atl.earthlink.net!not-for-mail
From: Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Need advice re package organization.
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 20:36:12 -0700
Organization: AdaWorks Software Engineering
Message-ID: <3F2F262C.7970ECB8@adaworks.com>
References: <pan.2003.07.26.13.08.25.810488@mail.utexas.edu>
 <3F228F3B.9020203@attbi.com> <yaxUa.374$XK4.16279@read1.cgocable.net>
 <3F22F9E9.3040307@attbi.com> <M2YUa.972$XK4.65085@read1.cgocable.net>
 <5jn9ivoetll1fu2avn9hmjj6aaa7q7pmjn@4ax.com>
 <y%xVa.1302$j_5.4631@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <fiveiv8h309dkvjqf6nb343osfjl41qt3o@4ax.com>
 <clWVa.4191$mv6.741217@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <jtkhivs294g51t3mfdbbj84mbcq1amn7fe@4ax.com>
Reply-To: richard@adaworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 41.b2.41.98
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Server-Date: 5 Aug 2003 03:32:19 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41190
Date: 2003-08-05T03:32:19+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote:

> However I should admit that there is a problem, not only in Ada, but
> it other OO languages too. It is a "philosophic" problem:

May I suggest you take a look at the Modula-3 approach to this problem.
It is quite a nice way to deal with it.

Not that I am suggesting Modula-3 since that language has its own
problems that make it unsuitable for safety-critical software.

There is no perfect language.  No, Hyman, even C++ is not a perfect
programming language -- any more than Ada or Eiffel are.

Richard Riehle