From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4e4ed3808be3c2fa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-15 20:13:34 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!harp.news.atl.earthlink.net!not-for-mail From: Richard Riehle Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada pitfalls. Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:16:59 -0700 Organization: AdaWorks Software Engineering Message-ID: <3F14C3AA.523F1424@adaworks.com> References: Reply-To: richard@adaworks.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 41.b2.48.04 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Date: 16 Jul 2003 03:13:34 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40318 Date: 2003-07-16T03:13:34+00:00 List-Id: prashna wrote: > Hi all, > I came across this site, > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~dale/ada/pitfalls/ when searching for > information on protected types. I started to read the information this site and got as far as the incorrect information regarding enumeration types. If the first posting is so wrong, one can only wonder about the rest of it. Richard Riehle