From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-28 09:43:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.telebyte.nl!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Alfred Hilscher Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 19:35:56 +0200 Organization: T-Online Message-ID: <3ED4F37C.2069BC1@alfred-hilscher.de> References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> <3ED3CCAE.C8733E2C@somewhere.nil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1054140152 01 3668 sK5TVU5SpATmP 030528 16:42:32 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de X-ID: Zp4mK0ZQZeVzFQeUiHySJcg-0tEvDhkOPnT6Twos6UQ71-jfgEIm4a X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37917 Date: 2003-05-28T19:35:56+02:00 List-Id: Why mark the beginning/ending of comments? Isn't the compiler intelligent enough to see what is meant as code and what should be interpreted as comment ;-) ... i : integer; Hey compiler don't read this Dear compiler, I know, you know this is no code ;-) i:=0; And this is a commentar, too. ... ----------------------------------------------------- To send me mail, please replace "Spam" by "Jedermann" ----------------------------------------------------- Gautier Write-only schrieb: > > Frank: > > > What about the possibility of commenting several lines like /* ...... */? > > Hey cool! I would add the possibility of nesting several of > such comments, or not, and why not also the { } and (* *) of Pascal. > A pragma would allow ending a { by a *) or */, or not, and ignoring > or not the rest of a line inside a "/*" after a -- (even if it has a */). > Did you understand ? I mean, it's simple. > And what about including chuncks of code - it would be so cool to > just insert "c:\...\mytools.inc" at some place instead of these packages. > Another idea: make some names implicitly type. E.g. I, J5, InJm > and so on are always integers, so why declare them ? > ________________________________________________________ > Gautier -- http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm > > NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!