From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6e97963d32ee242 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-21 09:21:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.nacamar.de!newsmi-eu.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!newsserver.cilea.it!news.crs4.it!not-for-mail From: Jacob Sparre Andersen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The old "Object.Method" syntax debate Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 18:21:12 +0200 Organization: CRS4, Center for Adv. Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia Message-ID: <3ECBA778.4070909@crs4.it> References: <254c16a.0305210726.485125de@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: sparre.crs4.it Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: pietro.crs4.it 1053533238 23114 156.148.2.163 (21 May 2003 16:07:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@nntpserver.crs4.it. NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 May 2003 16:07:18 GMT User-Agent: Any Browser, HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.0 X-Accept-Language: fo, da, no, sv, is, fr, de, it, Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37590 Date: 2003-05-21T16:07:18+00:00 List-Id: David C. Hoos wrote: > This was brought up in a forum regarding enhancements for Ada0X, > at the SIG-Ada meeting last December, and the consensus was it > should be done, so it probably will. Will the change mean that currently legal programs will have to be rewritten? Jacob -- "If you think Tuck has said something that is completely wrong, you are almost certainly missing something :-)"