From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,4b6de2fa4828c91e X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: fdb77,564174f9610b9ca X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b6de2fa4828c91e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-29 19:09:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!enews.sgi.com!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!harp.news.atl.earthlink.net!not-for-mail From: Richard Riehle Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is Microsoft de-emphasizing C# ? Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:09:35 -0700 Organization: AdaWorks Software Engineering Message-ID: <3EAF305F.D100B5F8@adaworks.com> References: <3EAAC29B.4050700@prodigy.net> <8900o-4qh.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net> Reply-To: richard@adaworks.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 41.b2.60.0c Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Date: 30 Apr 2003 02:09:40 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:62909 comp.lang.ada:36749 comp.lang.fortran:36475 Date: 2003-04-30T02:09:40+00:00 List-Id: Kent Paul Dolan wrote: > Well, at least Ada compiles into Java bytecode as well, in at > least one commercial compiler. Which compiler supports the current JVM? JGNAT no longer does. Is the Aonix compiler up-to-date for the current JVM? Richard Riehle