From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,50137bb64a119cfc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-25 09:39:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!beamish.news.atl.earthlink.net!guinness.news.atl.earthlink.net!news.atl.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!harp.news.atl.earthlink.net!not-for-mail From: Richard Riehle Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "access constant" discriminant Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:49:40 -0800 Organization: AdaWorks Software Engineering Message-ID: <3E5BACB4.610D3134@adaworks.com> References: <_TO1a.14664$9y2.6601@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <3CS1a.55972$2H6.1357@sccrnsc04> <3E4E9248.3E71D984@adaworks.com> <1ec946d1.0302201642.66eb93e5@posting.google.com> <1ec946d1.0302241111.3e816bb@posting.google.com> Reply-To: richard@adaworks.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 3f.bb.a0.2b Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Date: 25 Feb 2003 17:39:17 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34573 Date: 2003-02-25T17:39:17+00:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt wrote: > Never, ever use an explicit access in Ada95 if you can avoid it. Save > explicit accesses for dynamic allocation. Except, perhaps, as access to subprograms. This turns out to be a powerful capability of Ada 95. Richard Riehle