From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-Thread: 11232c,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public
X-Google-Thread: 112149,ed4fe672c3eaf3c3
X-Google-Attributes: gid112149,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,45d66c9c5017fc7d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 104c88,ed4fe672c3eaf3c3
X-Google-Attributes: gid104c88,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-23 13:58:15 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!64.152.100.70.MISMATCH!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!harp.news.atl.earthlink.net!not-for-mail
From: Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com>
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,misc.misc,comp.lsi,comp.hardware,comp.object,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: 64 bit addressing and OOP
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:08:16 -0800
Organization: AdaWorks Software Engineering
Message-ID: <3E594650.E09A986D@adaworks.com>
References: <b3601g$1j4sk7$1@ID-139894.news.dfncis.de>
 <memo.20030222112846.64077A@brangdon.madasafish.com>
 <b37off$1j0hm1$1@ID-139894.news.dfncis.de> <3E593457.CA43516E@adaworks.com>
 <b3bc18$1jh31e$1@ID-139894.news.dfncis.de>
Reply-To: richard@adaworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 3f.bb.80.87
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Server-Date: 23 Feb 2003 21:57:57 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:59197 comp.object:58023
 misc.misc:12111 comp.lsi:348 comp.hardware:21577 comp.lang.ada:34489
Date: 2003-02-23T21:57:57+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Mark Thornton wrote:

> Err, but Unicode already requires (I think) 21 bits which is the point of
> this thread.

Thanks, Mark.

I am including this reply in comp.lang.ada

So, will the next Ada standard include support for a 21 bit Unicode,
or am I missing something and it already does?

Richard Riehle