From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6a2e4a4c0d7d8a6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,3488d9e5d292649f
X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-20 14:10:38 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!24.30.200.11!news-east.rr.com!news-west.rr.com!cyclone.nyroc.rr.com!cyclone-out.nyroc.rr.com!twister.nyroc.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3E554BD4.96E35C65@yahoo.com>
From: Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: status of PL/I as a viable language
References: <mHZ0a.42983$jM5.108891@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>
 <nRg1a.190899$HG.32437469@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>
 <3E51908E.9CCA3412@adaworks.com>
 <8Gh4a.7455$_c6.743959@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
 <3E51ABCE.5491B9A2@adaworks.com> <b2spe6$p23$1@helle.btinternet.com>
 <3E5273DE.2050206@cox.net> <3E531E6F.BDFB2599@adaworks.com>
 <3E546C45.4010406@cox.net> <3E54F926.441D5BB5@adaworks.com>
 <1045763933.848350@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <42EA55F4BE83950E.F1DA277C2FDC157B.C804C1C52FE95D65@lp.airnews.net>
 <1045769690.126389@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:10:36 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.194.50.82
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com
X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1045779036 24.194.50.82 (Thu,
 20 Feb 2003 17:10:36 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:10:36 EST
Organization: Road Runner
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.pl1:4375 comp.lang.ada:34314
Date: 2003-02-20T22:10:36+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hyman Rosen wrote:
>  [Patriot missle failure]
> > It was an overflowed counter
> 

This rings a bell with me, too.

> Assuming that this is even true, would it have been better
> if the Patriot battery threw an exception? The (first?)
> Ariane 5 incident was pretty much the same, and that was in Ada.

What do you want to do, reboot the missle with the Scud on the way? 
This is a case of "assume makes an ASS out of yoU and ME".