From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0a15c81dbb968cc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-17 10:20:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: achrist@easystreet.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Best option for portable GUI? Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:20:25 -0800 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <3E284969.85FF8394@easystreet.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33153 Date: 2003-01-17T10:20:25-08:00 List-Id: "Robert C. Leif" wrote: > > This is now becoming feasible. The next portable GUI should employ XForms. > For Windows this can be downloaded from http://www.formsplayer.com/ The site says that the client uses the web browser. This is ok, but it says for Windows use IE 6. What other browsers work with XForms? I assume that 'portable' can't mean that we have to use IE 6. Al