From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,912597791e813f68
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-07 06:52:03 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Alfred Hilscher <Alfred.Hilscher@t-online.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: advantages or disadvantages of ADA over pascal or modula
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 15:47:51 +0100
Organization: T-Online
Message-ID: <3E1AE897.BDAA5A9C@t-online.de>
References: <3E18804E.8606224E@t-online.de> <0k2S9.253946$qF3.23112@sccrnsc04>
 <v1jqc48j818m39@corp.supernews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1041951008 04 11771 C8AUE73TSTa2YO 030107 14:50:08
X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com
X-Sender: 320001779794-0001@t-dialin.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: de
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32682
Date: 2003-01-07T15:47:51+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



Randy Brukardt schrieb:
> 
> The empty program on Windows makes an 29K .EXE file, the majority of
> that is Windows overhead (the actual code size is about 13500 bytes plus
> a little over 1K for data). The runtime can be recompiled without
> exception walkback support, which would save another 1.5K.
> 
>                    Randy Brukardt

This sounds good. But - how expensive is the compiler? Would it be a
choise for a hobbyist, or is it far beyond? I asked for Green Hills some
time, and I was shocked about the price.