From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a1ce307c10055549 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-15 23:11:42 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!wn11feed!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!207.217.77.102!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!harp.news.atl.earthlink.net!not-for-mail From: Richard Riehle Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: IBM Acquires Rational Ada Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:19:57 -0800 Organization: AdaWorks Software Engineering Message-ID: <3DFD7E9D.69976C19@adaworks.com> References: Reply-To: richard@adaworks.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 3f.bb.a1.31 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Date: 16 Dec 2002 07:11:41 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31875 Date: 2002-12-16T07:11:41+00:00 List-Id: Hyman Rosen wrote: > Grein, Christoph wrote: > > Oh, thanx, Fraser, for enlightening me what all this unreadable C junk means :-) > > This "unreadable C junk" runs the internet, and the newsgroup software > which is allowing you to disseminate your contempt. You should have a > little respect for your grandpappy. Yes, and back on the farm we kept equipment operating by clever use of baling wire. One of my colleagues asked me recently why I was so reluctant to use C or C++ for my programs. I replied that C++ was reminiscent of the strike-anywhere matches our grandpappies named "barnburners." Just today, I was reading a book on software architecture in which the authors acknowledged that the vast marjority of C++ is noted for being unmaintainable by anyone except its creator. The fact that C and C++ is so widely used to create popular software is no different than the fact that so many people select MacDonald's, Burger King, or Kentucky Fried Mynah Bird, for their sustenance under the illusion they are actually being nourished. The fact that something is popular does not make it good. I am required, during these past couple of years, to spend more and more time with C++. The more time I spend with it, the more horrified I am at the thought it is being used for our military weapon systems. If C++ is the best we can do, this industry is in trouble for a very long time to come. Richard Riehle