From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2e26b805f6d341ba X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-15 09:37:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!news From: cjsonnack@mmm.com (Programmer Dude) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Aspect-Oriented Programming Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:13:15 -0500 Organization: 3M Company Message-ID: <3DAC3E9B.5C122B1E@mmm.com> References: <3D975896.CDB6CA2E@adaworks.com> <3d977d7e.65439093@news.cis.dfn.de> <3DA5E540.65F4DEF3@mmm.com> <3DA5EC5A.1060506@worldnet.att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-CCK-MCD 3M/NCP 4.5 (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29801 Date: 2002-10-15T11:13:15-05:00 List-Id: Jim Rogers wrote: >>> private package body Ice_Cream.Debug.After is >>> [...] >>> end Ice_Cream.Debug.After; >>> >> >> Should the keyword "body" not be there above? (I have, so far, only >> a smattering, passing knowledge of Ada, so I'm probably wrong.) >> >> In any event, I found it a very educational example; thanks! > > These are private package specifications. As such they must not > have the word "body" as part of their declaration line. The private > bodies would have the word "body". Cool! I just debugged my first Ada program!! ;-) -- |_ CJSonnack _____________| How's my programming? | |_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL | |_____________________________________________|_______________________| Opinions expressed herein are my own and may not represent those of my employer.