From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2e26b805f6d341ba
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-10 14:09:51 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3DA5EC5A.1060506@worldnet.att.net>
From: Jim Rogers <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US;
 rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Aspect-Oriented Programming
References: <3D975896.CDB6CA2E@adaworks.com>
 <3d977d7e.65439093@news.cis.dfn.de> <3DA5E540.65F4DEF3@mmm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:09:51 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.86.33.197
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1034284191 12.86.33.197 (Thu,
 10 Oct 2002 21:09:51 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:09:51 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29695
Date: 2002-10-10T21:09:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Programmer Dude wrote:

> Nick Roberts wrote:
> 
> I was very interested in your example of AOP.  I puzzled over this:
> 
> 
>>Now, suppose we wished to divide this into the aspects: Debug.Before;
>>Main; Debug.After. The refactoring would generate the following
>>compilation units:
>>
>>   private package Ice_Cream.Debug is end;
>>   private package Ice_Cream.Debug.Before is
>>       [...]
>>   end Ice_Cream.Debug.Before;
>>
>>   private package Ice_Cream.Main is
>>       [...]
>>   end Ice_Cream.Main;
>>
>>   private package body Ice_Cream.Debug.After is
>>       [...]
>>   end Ice_Cream.Debug.After;
>>
> 
> Should the keyword "body" not be there above?  (I have, so far, only
> a smattering, passing knowledge of Ada, so I'm probably wrong.)
> 
> In any event, I found it a very educational example; thanks!
>


These are private package specifications. As such they must not
have the word "body" as part of their declaration line. The private
bodies would have the word "body".

Jim Rogers