From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7f5eed426d6145 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-20 09:24:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.infoave.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!cyclone.swbell.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3D8B48F2.3CAD7FA5@despammed.com> From: Wes Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,es-MX,es,pt,fr-CA,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C++ to Ada translator? References: <1032376330.392712@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3D89DF47.918EE3D1@despammed.com> <3d8a5d4d$1@giga.realtime.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:12:34 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.168.144.162 X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com X-Trace: dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com 1032538361 151.168.144.162 (Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:12:41 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:12:41 CDT Organization: Raytheon Company Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29227 Date: 2002-09-20T11:12:34-05:00 List-Id: Ira Baxter wrote: > I'll agree that the translated code is not a pretty or nice > as that written by an experienced engineer. I've seen > much worse code from some so-called "professional" engineers. My point (and I think you suported it) was that, although the output of either kind of translator is not acceptable for delivery either one can provide a valuable, time-saving head start. -- Wes Groleau http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau