From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9d4dd8154a69ea5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-13 09:03:11 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed.cgocable.net!read1.cgocable.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3D820C3E.6080000@cogeco.ca> From: "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Performance problem between SAMBA and Gnat References: <7ff8fedb.0209130639.73c7489@posting.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:03:10 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.150.168.167 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cogeco.ca X-Trace: read1.cgocable.net 1031933187 24.150.168.167 (Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:06:27 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:06:27 EDT Organization: Cogeco Cable Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28942 Date: 2002-09-13T12:03:10-04:00 List-Id: BAILLET philippe wrote: > I have performance problems when i compile ADA files on NT 4.0 with > the Gnat compiler when the files are located on a SAMBA UNIX > Filesystem. Certainly the most time is spend in the checking phase. > > Could you help me ? You havn't provided enough information. 1. Where is the compiler? On Linux? Or on NT? 2. Where are the source files really? (see below) There seems to be a discrepancy: first you say "Ada files on NT" and later you say the files are located on "SAMBA UNIX filesystem." Where are the Ada files really? If you have NFS access, how do the file access times compare with NFS? I can't help anyway, but can offer you my own observations, using SAMBA: - From Windows 98, accessing files on FreeBSD SAMBA is reasonable (a little slower than NFS) - From Windows 2000, accessing files on FreeBSD SAMBA can be dreadfully slow (there seems to be an authentication timeout occurring -- once past this, the times are comparable to win98). I may have win2k configuration problems WRT to SAMBA. But I suggest that to get better help, you need to be much more concise, and fully state the problem. -- Warren W. Gay VE3WWG http://home.cogeco.ca/~ve3wwg