From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,10f9da4d1c65612e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-11 08:58:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!213.155.153.242!not-for-mail From: Peter Amey Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada test tools Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:00:18 +0100 Organization: Praxis Critical Systems Message-ID: <3D7F6892.D6CCFADB@praxis-cs.co.uk> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.155.153.242 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1031759891 62800706 213.155.153.242 (16 [69815]) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28827 Date: 2002-09-11T17:00:18+01:00 List-Id: d wrote: > > Looking into some test tools like AdaCAST (from VectorCAST) and also > LDRA. Unit testing, MC/DC, integration level tests, coverage > analysis, auto test driver a plus. > > What is the current state of test tools using primarily Ada? > > Suggestions? > AdaTest from IPL (http://www.iplbath.com/products/tools/pt600.shtml) Peter