From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,55958fd991db66fe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-10 15:34:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: achrist@easystreet.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Advantage of XML based GUI? (was Re: Ada-inspired OS/Language) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:32:06 -0700 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <3D7E72E6.D2B756F0@easystreet.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28809 Date: 2002-09-10T15:32:06-07:00 List-Id: See the article on slashdot today pointing to: http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2002/09/10/browser_wars/index.html Which mentions Mozilla as a cross-platform GUI tool that is controlled by something called XUL. Maybe an Ada-to-XUL API is what we need. Al Preben Randhol wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 22:21:11 -0700, Robert C. Leif wrote: > > [long nice explanation] > > so it boils down to two things: GUI portability and XML being in. Costs > are as I see it increase CPU usage and memory usage. > > Preben