From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,55958fd991db66fe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-07 06:44:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!harp.news.atl.earthlink.net!not-for-mail From: Marin David Condic Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada-inspired OS/Language Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 09:43:33 -0400 Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Message-ID: <3D7A0284.5910B06@acm.org> References: <3D628304.3040506@cogeco.ca> <3d6e9cb6.75108980@news.cis.dfn.de> <3D78E66E.983D7B51@adaworks.com> <3d793f8c.503399757@news.cis.dfn.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: d1.56.b3.c9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Date: 7 Sep 2002 13:44:12 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en] (WinNT; I) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28774 Date: 2002-09-07T13:44:12+00:00 List-Id: I can see Richard's point about "AdaOS" possibly having connotations that might be off-putting to some people. However, far more important than the name is that there be some usable, working piece of it in existence. Concentrate on getting something that can boot up on an average PC and do *something* semi-useful and you will have accomplished a lot. Even if all it will do is fire up a command line and load some simple programs, you will have accomplished a lot and provided something on which to build. Getting too ambitious too soon is just going to kill it. Stick to some subset of stuff that will enable the hobbyist to use easily available tools (A PC and the Gnat compiler are a good start...) to a) develop pieces of the OS and b) develop apps for the OS and you will thus attract the developers to get the effort moved along. Changing the name later is no problem. Rename it "NickOS" if it seems to sell better that way - but if there isn't anything to sell, the name won't matter much. I'd be impressed if you had assembled a development kit, instructions and some minimal code that would serve as the starting point for an OS. Something to compile a bootstrap program and get it on a floppy that when power-cycling the PC would start up & load some other program. You need at least that much to start any serious OS development and getting that far would constitute "A Good Start". Getting the tools together and a bootstrap going isn't going to impact the overall design of the OS, so you don't have to have that thoroughly designed in order to get started. MDC -- ====================================================================== Marin David Condic I work for: http://www.belcan.com/ My project is: http://www.jast.mil/ Send Replies To: m c o n d i c @ a c m . o r g "I'd trade it all for just a little more" -- Charles Montgomery Burns, [4F10] ====================================================================== Nick Roberts wrote: > > I rather agree with you. AdaOS was originally named 'Alguinntar', which was > perhaps not the most inspiring name! Shortly after the project was formed > (in 1999), the members (then about 15) had a vote on the name, and the > overwhelming majority voted for 'AdaOS'. > > I