From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,22815351c45a997f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-03 10:23:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3D74EFBE.7050102@worldnet.att.net> From: Jim Rogers User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Free GNU Ada Run-Time Book (version 0.7) - Thanks! References: <3D74BE22.1080806@worldnet.att.net> <3D74EA9A.1030101@cogeco.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 17:23:15 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.86.34.238 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1031073795 12.86.34.238 (Tue, 03 Sep 2002 17:23:15 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 17:23:15 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28707 Date: 2002-09-03T17:23:15+00:00 List-Id: Warren W. Gay VE3WWG wrote: > Jim Rogers wrote: > >> ica2ph@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de wrote: >> >>> In article you wrote: >>> >>>> Title : A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE GNU ADA RUN-TIME >>>> Version : Beta 0.7 >>>> Last Update: September, 3, 2002 >>>> Author : Javier Miranda >>>> Access : http://www.iuma.ulpgc.es/users/jmiranda >>> >>> >>> Javier, >>> >>> the pdf-version seems to be crippled insofar that the headlines >>> are cut by 3/4 , i.e. unreadable >> >> >> It worked correctly when I read it using Acrobat Reader version 4.0. >> >> Jim Rogers > > > Are you sure you were looking at the top of page "headlines"? > The rest was OK, indeed. > > Looking at it with version 5.0, I had the same experience > (top headlines are cut). The postscript version is fine though. You are correct. I do now see some partial artifacts from the page headers. Jim Rogers