From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,10a739dd228c3f5e
X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ff18b3dfbae1e1d6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-28 08:26:55 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!syros.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.wxs.nl!amsnews01.chello.com!news01.chello.se!newsfeed1.telenordia.se!algonet!uab.ericsson.se!erinews.ericsson.se!newstoo.ericsson.se!not-for-mail
From: Mikael Lundqvist <mikael.lundqvist@avionics.saab.se>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime
Subject: Re: Ada as a real time language
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:25:50 +0200
Organization: Saab Avionics
Message-ID: <3D6CEB7E.E6930EAD@avionics.saab.se>
References: <aki282$jhp$1@newstoo.ericsson.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.17.83.132
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28503 comp.realtime:6137
Date: 2002-08-28T17:25:50+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have heard that the Ada Run Time doesn't handle load
that well. If you have to many tasks or to much input/output
the Runtime gives in so to speak. In that regard you should
be better of with a RTOS. I have not any experience myself
with large Ada programs. Anybody out there who could comment?

Regards,
Mikael

Marcus Hedlund wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I was just wondering about the real-time quality in the Ada language.
> Is it possible to write a good hard real-time system without a RTOS, or
> is it necesary to use a RTOS to achieve good real-time proporties?
>
> Any help will be greatly appreciated
>
> //M.Hedlund