From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d59853e2dd116420 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-03 01:45:34 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!blackbush.xlink.net!blackbush.de.kpnqwest.net!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail From: "Dr. Michael Paus" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: JGNAT status??? (was: Re: Help: Problem with JGnat) Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2002 10:45:33 +0200 Organization: 1&1 Internet AG Message-ID: <3D4B982D.7010100@ib-paus.com> References: <3d49f31b@oit.umass.edu> <3D4A3D23.6090905@ib-paus.com> <3D4A7C39.2AF0BA8@earthlink.net> <5fe90c1a.0208021138.54f5817f@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p5083086c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.online.de 1028364333 7778 80.131.8.108 (3 Aug 2002 08:45:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@online.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Aug 2002 08:45:33 GMT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27643 Date: 2002-08-03T08:45:33+00:00 List-Id: Britt Snodgrass wrote: > "Marc A. Criley" wrote in message > > >>I've heard that the last supported version of JGNAT worked okay with >>1.3, but I know of no access to that version. In addition, ACT has >>terminated support for JGNAT :-( Business decision on their part, for >>which I can't blame them--their intent is to make a profit, after >>all--but I really liked the concept and had been heavily using the >>public version. Oh well. >> >>Marc A. Criley > > > I've been curious if A.C.T. plans a (final?) public release of the > current (final?) JGNAT source code. Yes, a new public version of the current JGNAT sources would be great if it is true that a version exists which runs on Java 1.3+. I never saw any commercial chances for this as a product but anyway it is an interesting tool to play with. Maybe we can convince ACT to consider this. Michael