From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,daf1e35a4e978e9d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-21 18:05:39 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!cox.net!p02!news2.east.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3D13CD23.9080404@telepath.com> From: Ted Dennison User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: have to use unrestricted access but just what about access References: <0x8Q8.6779$ZP1.1263481@news11-gui.server.ntli.net> <5ee5b646.0206210345.2d58d8e0@posting.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 01:05:37 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.12.51.201 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net X-Trace: news2.east.cox.net 1024707937 68.12.51.201 (Fri, 21 Jun 2002 21:05:37 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 21:05:37 EDT Organization: Cox Communications Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26582 Date: 2002-06-22T01:05:37+00:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > I agree that this is a nasty restriction in Ada 95 -- one ought to be > allowed to declare the parameter aliased explicitly, and taggedness > shouldn't have anything to do with the matter. Isn't that what the "access" parameter mode does? Sure, you have to announce your intentions in the subprogram's interface, but that is arguably a good thing too.