From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,4935d00fd2d40578 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-21 00:33:56 PST Message-ID: <3D12D571.D6BABA29@sympatico.ca> From: David Marceau X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.17-10mdksmp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: strange problem.Help pleeeeeeeeeese References: <14763faf.0206202132.14bb4f04@posting.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 03:27:45 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.92.168.132 X-Complaints-To: abuse@sympatico.ca X-Trace: news20.bellglobal.com 1024644648 65.92.168.132 (Fri, 21 Jun 2002 03:30:48 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 03:30:48 EDT Organization: Bell Sympatico Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!torn!webster!nf1.bellglobal.com!nf2.bellglobal.com!news20.bellglobal.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26540 Date: 2002-06-21T03:27:45-04:00 List-Id: Ashwath wrote: > > Hello, > I am facing a peculiar problem while testing Ada procedure. > The procedure has a variable which is local to it and it is of type ok a first level proc here. > called T_REPORT.T_REPORT is a enumeration type and it contains 3 > values CORRECT,DEFINED and UNDEFINED and is defined in another generic > package called BLACK_BOARD.Now That local variable is passed to some > procedure which will set it to the value CORRECT.After invoking that ok a second level proc here. My guess is maybe your procedure parameter declaration for this second level proc is not "in out" for the one that you pass LOCAL_VARIABLE to. If it's just in, you could probably guess that it would not change. Fix it to "in out". > procedure the local variable is compared as follows ok back to the first proc you do an if. Fine. > if LOCAL_VARIABLE /= REPORT_BDS.CORRECT then > ..... > ..... > else > .... > .... > end if; > Note that REPROT_BDS is instantiation of the package BLACK_BOARD. > While debugging, the execution is going to the else part.Please let me > know what might be the problem? So you're in gdb. info locals on the line before entering the second level proc. info locals after next'ing over this second level proc. -If LOCAL_VARIABLE changed as expected then your second level proc has an "in out" spec for your parameter that you passed LOCAL_VARIABLE into. That means the problem really is your if statement. -If LOCAL_VARIABLE did not change as expected then your second level proc is the source of your problem. Change the spec for the parameter to "in out". If that's not the issue then it's in the body of the second level procedure or even lower. Sant� bonheur, David Marceau