From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,52fd60a337c05842 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-14 09:38:19 PST Message-ID: <3D0A1A15.C600F684@sympatico.ca> From: David Marceau X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.17-10mdksmp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada paper critic References: <3D0976BD.21FA7516@sympatico.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:30:13 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.92.168.142 X-Complaints-To: abuse@sympatico.ca X-Trace: news20.bellglobal.com 1024072405 65.92.168.142 (Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:33:25 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:33:25 EDT Organization: Bell Sympatico Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!torn!webster!nf1.bellglobal.com!nf2.bellglobal.com!news20.bellglobal.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25955 Date: 2002-06-14T12:30:13-04:00 List-Id: Baugereau wrote: > > > 1)asm > > 2)C > > 3)ada > > 3)C++ Same rank number 3 :) > > 4)java > > What allow you to say that C++ is slower than Ada? I apologize for the lack of clarity. Actually I meant Ada95 is usually a bit slower than c and c++. That certainly doesn't make ada inferior to c/c++. Ada places more importance on reliability, platform-independance, long-term maintainability and long-term reuse. As coders we are faced with decisions on what kind of software engineering lifestyle we want to live. I have decided to go with Ada and Linux lifestyles for the long haul and it has much to do with reliability, platform-independance, long-term maintainability and long-term reuse. > Mhh. What Ada compiler produces faster code than the best C++ compiler on > x86 for instance? I don't know. It has never been my preoccupation. Sant� bonheur, David Marceau