From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,539157e0f6cd0993,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-11 10:55:10 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!jobone!dailyplanet.srl.ford.com!eccws12.dearborn.ford.com!not-for-mail
From: John Kern <jkern3@NOSPAM.visteon.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: C programmers and safety critical systems programming
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:56:08 -0400
Organization: Visteon Coropration
Message-ID: <3D062BA8.5B7F2C26@NOSPAM.visteon.com>
Reply-To: jkern3@NOSPAM.visteon.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 19.51.198.11
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en]C-c32f404p  (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en, en-GB, de, fr, ja, ko, zh
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25752
Date: 2002-06-11T12:56:08-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Just noticed an editorial in Embedded Systems Programming which takes C
programmers to task for ignoring better language choices.

"Is C Passing?" by Michael Barr.
http://www.embedded.com/story/OEG20020523S0040

Perhaps this is an opportunity for Ada enthusiasts to speak up in a
publication dominated by C.