From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b73eb137e4ed638
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-19 14:14:19 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.net.uni-c.dk!not-for-mail
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Compilers
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 23:14:12 +0200
Organization: Centre for Chaos and Turbulence Studies, Niels Bohr Institute
Message-ID: <3CE815A4.DD452558@nbi.dk>
References: <3CE2AF22.2060208@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net>
 <878z6kq4rr.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <ac0bem$g6n$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3CE58053.2020809@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: alf.nbi.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.net.uni-c.dk 1021842858 21728 130.225.212.55 (19 May 2002
 21:14:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.net.uni-c.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:14:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; OSF1 V4.0 alpha)
X-Accept-Language: fo,da,no,sv,is,de,fr,en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24388
Date: 2002-05-19T23:14:12+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

David Rasmussen wrote:

> So my
> question was if, in practice, most Ada compilers generate code that is
> comparable to, say, C++ compilers.

I haven't had time to compare the GCC 3.1 Ada and C++
compilers yet, but last time I compared the front-ends, the
Ada front-end was clearly better at optimising than the C++
one.

Jacob
-- 
Sk�ne Sj�lland Linux User Group - http://www.sslug.dk/
N�ste m�de: Foredragsaften p� Lunds Tekniske H�gskola.
Torsdag den 30. maj 2002 p�/i Lund, LTH, E:2116.