From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,84bf0ec36cf20893 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-17 16:15:08 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3CE58EAD.BD67EFD0@despammed.com> From: Wes Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,es-MX,es,pt,fr-CA,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Would an *AdaScript* language be a good / bad idea? References: <5ee5b646.0205140618.2d789fc9@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0205151846.4b14a73f@posting.google.com> <3CE3D8B4.C272C737@san.rr.com> <3CE3EA03.394B3EA@despammed.com> <3CE3FFE7.775E5103@san.rr.com> <3CE514CD.DC9C679@despammed.com> <3CE52E77.FC3FC588@san.rr.com> <3CE53670.3E5E177D@san.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 18:13:49 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.168.144.162 X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com X-Trace: dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com 1021677238 151.168.144.162 (Fri, 17 May 2002 18:13:58 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 18:13:58 CDT Organization: Raytheon Company Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24319 Date: 2002-05-17T18:13:49-05:00 List-Id: > > Because I don't need those other four steps in Ada. > > Sorry. Of course I meant, I don't need those other four steps except in Ada. If your script didn't write the script you are sourcing, then your Ada program doesn't need to write the program it invokes. -- Wes Groleau http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau