From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1dd28d5040ded1f8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-16 09:27:38 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.abs.net!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!spool0900.news.uu.net!reader0902.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3CE3DE43.5060504@mail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 12:28:51 -0400
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US;
 rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Announce: Grace project site operational
References: <4519e058.0205140718.3ddb1b2a@posting.google.com>
 <X7cE8.1439$fv.108467406@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>
 <slrnae2kjt.4m1.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <slrnae2ksi.4m1.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3CE15D0A.3050100@mail.com> <3ce21f37$1@pull.gecm.com>
 <uk7q5e0q8.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> <3CE2AB7E.AD4A9956@san.rr.com>
 <3CE2B842.7060705@mail.com> <3CE2F4E3.DABF19D7@san.rr.com>
 <u3cwsdxm3.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> <3CE3D578.901D6C43@san.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@mosquito.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.3.3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10
X-Trace: 1021566457 reader2.ash.ops.us.uu.net 7727 204.253.250.10
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24210
Date: 2002-05-16T12:28:51-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Darren New wrote:
> Fair enough. It would seem odd to me that a template (which you're
> basically going to recompile every time you compile any C++ code, isn't
> that how it works?) is going to compile faster than simply "with"ing
> something you've already compiled.

For some compilers, "with"ing a package means reading the source
of the package specification, which is no different than C++
reading the template definition.