From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b73eb137e4ed638,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-15 11:55:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.162.153.118!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3CE2AF22.2060208@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net> Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 20:55:30 +0200 From: David Rasmussen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020412 Debian/0.9.9-6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Ada Compilers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: TDC Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.215.62.2 X-Trace: 1021488949 dtext.news.tele.dk 7625 195.215.62.2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24115 Date: 2002-05-15T20:55:30+02:00 List-Id: What is the best free Ada compiler available? I know that question is probably silly and will get me redirected to the faq. Still, I would like to hear _people's_ opinion, instead of the usual "we can't say what's best, that's relative". More importantly, what do the free compilers lack in contrast to the commercial ones? Also, how portable is typical Ada, and how good is code generation compared to C++ on the same platform (typically)? /David