From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,be0ffa00e7ee1ac6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-12 08:46:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!newsfeed.cs.wisc.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!netaxs.com!newsread.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Freddy Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why not MaRTE was Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ? Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 18:35:14 +0200 Organization: T-Online Message-ID: <3CDE99C2.C6CB780@web.de> References: <3CCE5AB0.D02EA0A4@icn.siemens.de> <1103_1020738153@news.blueyonder.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1021218326 03 23290 v6UVbMIVSvanE6 020512 15:45:26 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 320001779794-0001@t-dialin.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23929 Date: 2002-05-12T18:35:14+02:00 List-Id: Nick Roberts schrieb: > > Alfred, > > If you are talking about the requirements for AdaOS > (and I'm not at all sure you are), then (to my mind) > RTEMS falls short of far too many of our > requirements. Hi Nick, as far I understood, Alfred talkes about "MaRTE OS". I'm not sure whether it can fit the need for "AdaOS".