From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,84be9c5a380874d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-08 01:47:27 PST
Message-ID: <3CD8E61B.988423F2@epfl.ch>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 10:47:23 +0200
From: "Charles Fr. Rey" <charlesfr.rey@epfl.ch>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: WAY OFF TOPIC
References: <3CCD2328.C5722FC3@epfl.ch> <aanpmm$9td$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
 <3CCF8702.A7537851@epfl.ch> <5ee5b646.0205010433.6fc30656@posting.google.com>
 <3CD0E169.88A260A0@epfl.ch> <5ee5b646.0205020353.650900e5@posting.google.com>
 <3CD237A7.B91E6F32@epfl.ch> <3cd2816f$1@news.cadence.com>
 <db6d897a.0205051240.193c7e6a@posting.google.com>
 <3CD6A43A.657623F8@despammed.com> <3CD7C043.B101F4A4@epfl.ch>
 <3CD80AFF.772FDF34@despammed.com>
 <slrnadg972.c0c.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: cosun143.epfl.ch
X-Trace: epflnews.epfl.ch 1020847643 cosun143.epfl.ch (8 May 2002 10:47:23
 +0200)
Organization: EPFL
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!cox.net!newspeer1-gui.server.ntli.net!ntli.net!news2.euro.net!news.mailgate.org!news-zh.switch.ch!epflnews.epfl.ch
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23707
Date: 2002-05-08T10:47:23+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Preben Randhol wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 07 May 2002 12:12:31 -0500, Wes Groleau wrote:
> >
> >> > And a newsgroup is not a private communication, anyway.
> 
> Who said this?
> 
> >>
> >> No ? please, tell me what it is ... I consider it is a kind of private
> 
> And who said this?
> 
> > With e-mail, the recipient know what he sent and doesn't
> > need it quoted back, except maybe sometimes as a memory jogger.
> > With Usenet, the reader may have never seen the previous post.
> 
> Exactly, so please don't remove the name of the person(s) you are
> quoting. :-)

:-)