From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,84be9c5a380874d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-03 06:22:01 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-mue1.dfn.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news2.euro.net!uunet!ash.uu.net!spool0900.news.uu.net!reader0900.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3CD28EF8.40004@mail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 09:22:00 -0400
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US;
 rv:0.9.9+) Gecko/20020425
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: [OT] ettiquite - was gprof with gnat
References: <3CCD2328.C5722FC3@epfl.ch> <aanpmm$9td$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
 <3CCF8702.A7537851@epfl.ch> <5ee5b646.0205010433.6fc30656@posting.google.com>
 <3CD0E169.88A260A0@epfl.ch> <5ee5b646.0205020353.650900e5@posting.google.com>
 <3CD14A98.6CF0B177@raytheon.com>
 <5ee5b646.0205030041.51430c7e@posting.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@fixedcost.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.3.3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10
X-Trace: 1020432120 reader0.ash.ops.us.uu.net 20413 204.253.250.10
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23495
Date: 2002-05-03T09:22:00-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar wrote:
> I find that I bother to look at fewer and fewer CLA threads these days,
 > because so many of them have excessive noise to signal ratio.

I think you have been saying this ever since I can remember :-)