From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d89b08801f2aacae X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-03 03:18:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr17.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3CD264BC.CBD280A2@flash.net> From: Gary Scott Reply-To: scottg@flash.net Organization: Home X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en]C-DIAL (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is strong typing worth the cost? References: <3CCEB246.9090009@worldnet.att.net> <3CCFFB7F.B8080F7A@despammed.com> <3CD1608B.A6336379@despammed.com> <3CD16D9E.912B1659@lmtas.lmco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.62.119.86 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr17.news.prodigy.com 1020421065 ST000 216.62.119.86 (Fri, 03 May 2002 06:17:45 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 06:17:45 EDT X-UserInfo1: [[PAPDONF[^M@LX_ICCHOPP@FJ^ZTB\MV@BNMRQIMASJETAANVW[AKWZE\]^XQWIGNE_[EBL@^_\^JOCQ^RSNVLGTFTKHTXHHP[NB\_C@\SD@EP_[KCXX__AGDDEKGFNB\ZOKLRNCY_CGG[RHT_UN@C_BSY\G__IJIX_PLSA[CCFAULEY\FL\VLGANTQQ]FN Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 10:17:45 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23484 Date: 2002-05-03T10:17:45+00:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol wrote: > > On Thu, 02 May 2002 14:48:16 -0400, Dan Nagle wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Better, use the Mil-Std-1753 (sp?) implicit none statement. > > > > De facto standard due to the necessity of the military market. > > Don't have it. We have a NAG F90 compiler only. It (IMPLICIT NONE) is standard in F90 (including NAG F90). It was an extension only in FORTRAN 77. > > Preben -- Gary Scott mailto:scottg@flash.net mailto:webmaster@fortranlib.com http://www.fortranlib.com Support the GNU Fortran G95 Project: http://g95.sourceforge.net