From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,84be9c5a380874d5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-03 00:09:30 PST Message-ID: <3CD237A7.B91E6F32@epfl.ch> Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 09:09:27 +0200 From: "Charles Fr. Rey" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: gprof with gnat References: <3CCD2328.C5722FC3@epfl.ch> <3CCF8702.A7537851@epfl.ch> <5ee5b646.0205010433.6fc30656@posting.google.com> <3CD0E169.88A260A0@epfl.ch> <5ee5b646.0205020353.650900e5@posting.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: cosun143.epfl.ch X-Trace: epflnews.epfl.ch 1020409767 cosun143.epfl.ch (3 May 2002 09:09:27 +0200) Organization: EPFL Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsmi-us.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!area.cu.mi.it!news.mailgate.org!news-zh.switch.ch!epflnews.epfl.ch Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23470 Date: 2002-05-03T09:09:27+02:00 List-Id: OK for the option .. I'll try it .. BTW, I think it's sometime necessary to leave the original message quoted, so if you save it or whatever else, you got the whole thing in one message, and you don't need to read the 15 levels of previous messages "manually". I also agree that unnecessary text in a reply should be removed. For example, this message is a perfect message (in the form): reply message on top, only two levels of quotes, and a newly arrived ngreader can understand what we're talking about. Don't you agree ? Robert Dewar wrote: > > "Charles Fr. Rey" wrote in message news:<3CD0E169.88A260A0@epfl.ch>... > > I use netscape/UNIX ... :-), so it's not a cro$oft problem ... > > there's a "Automatically quote original message when replying" option, > > but I guess that if I turn it off, the original message will still be > > there but without quotes (and thus more unreadable) ... if you have a > > better solution, tell me, please. > > You guess wrong, turn it off!