From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,be0ffa00e7ee1ac6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-30 01:49:55 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!transit.news.xs4all.nl!195.129.110.18.MISMATCH!bnewspeer00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!newsfeed.siemens.de!news.siemens.de!news.mch.sbs.de!not-for-mail
From: Alfred Hilscher <Alfred.Hilscher@icn.siemens.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Why not MaRTE  was  Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:49:52 +0200
Organization: Siemens AG
Message-ID: <3CCE5AB0.D02EA0A4@icn.siemens.de>
References: <mailman.1019948342.7875.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 139.21.122.158
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23261
Date: 2002-04-30T10:49:52+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



sk wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have had time to "revisit" the EduOs-Ada project and
> during much needed research run accross RTEMS.
> 
> A brief look at the RTEMS specs would suggest that
> RTEMS either meets most of the needs discussed in
> 2 or 3 years (at least) of threads in cla or is
> capable of supporting those needs.
> 
> I am wondering why the contributors to the said
> threads do not regard RTEMS as a suitable OS to
> adopt as a platform for playing with ?
> 
> Any insights appreciated, thanks.
> 
> (RTEMS at => http://www.oarcorp.com/)


http://marte.unican.es/