From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-25 12:05:33 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!unlisys!news.snafu.de!boavista!nobody
From: Michael Erdmann <Michael.Erdmann@snafu.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Outside view (still): Development process in the Ada community
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:29:08 +0200
Organization: [Posted via] Inter.net Germany GmbH
Message-ID: <3CC83CE4.3050701@snafu.de>
References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de>
 <cc3099f93a91d1e9c18e88d1a6381f6f.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <5ee5b646.0204171415.18ac5e85@posting.google.com>
 <99c4aee4a9ea33ca8fbe1e634b3b4f14.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <3CBE49C4.99CFA22D@adaworks.com> <a9mjv9$t9b$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3CC05650.5060908@snafu.de> <a9ppc5$fve$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <5ee5b646.0204220957.242468c6@posting.google.com> <3CC468AA.7070306@snafu.de>
 <87znzv1ny5.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <3CC4E8E8.1090308@snafu.de>
 <87znzunobi.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tc08-n66-173.de.inter.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: en-us
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23117
Date: 2002-04-25T19:29:08+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Florian Weimer wrote:
> Michael Erdmann <Michael.Erdmann@snafu.de> writes:
> 
> 
>>>There is already a contribution process: submit a patch to
>>>gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org. ;-)
>>>
> 
>>But this has more the falvour of beeing an error correction
>>process!?
>>
> 
> Yes, your patch is subjected to review, of course.
> 
> Or do you think that the list is for GCC bug fixes only?  This is
> wrong, all patches (even patches adding new features) should be sent
> to this list for consideration.
> 

This is new to me!