From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-18 13:25:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!colt.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!unlisys!news.snafu.de!boavista!nobody From: Michael Erdmann Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Development process in the Ada community Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:28:47 +0200 Organization: [Posted via] Inter.net Germany GmbH Message-ID: <3CBF2C7F.8070208@snafu.de> References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> <3CBAFFEE.2080708@snafu.de> <4519e058.0204171036.6f0a7394@posting.google.com> <3CBDD795.4060706@snafu.de> <4519e058.0204180800.44fac012@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: tc07-n66-118.de.inter.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: en-us To: Ted Dennison Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22750 Date: 2002-04-18T22:28:47+02:00 List-Id: > >>Just look at this, on the next ada conference in vienna they will >>have a talk about this as well. >> >>http://www.auto.tuwien.ac.at/AE2002/problems.html >> > > Yes, one of the organizers invited me to attend, based on my leading > of our List work. Unfortunately, a trip overseas to Vienna doesn't > exactly fit into my vacation schedule or personal budget this year. > > Since we mostly have a package worked out (at great pains) for lists, > hopefully they will concentrate on defining what other containers are > needed and how best to extend what we have. If there are any really > nasty flaws or fatal problems with the current package, that would be > an important issue too though. > > Since you are interested in this, I highly suggest you look over the > "strawman" threads in Google to bring yourself up to speed before > comming up with anything. It was a very extensive process and I'm not > really keen on going back over what has alredy been done yet again. > Please can you direct me a little more detailed? Michael. > >