From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-18 13:01:59 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!unlisys!news.snafu.de!boavista!nobody
From: Michael Erdmann <Michael.Erdmann@snafu.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Rant! (was) Development process in the Ada community
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:03:37 +0200
Organization: [Posted via] Inter.net Germany GmbH
Message-ID: <3CBF2699.7060900@snafu.de>
References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> <3CB9375F.8040904@snafu.de>
 <qnlsMmlYZCr9@eisner.encompasserve.org> <3CB9AF3C.8030301@snafu.de>
 <a9es6v$8c7$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3CBC5281.1040202@snafu.de>
 <a9hn0i$iqe$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3CBDAAA9.5050302@snafu.de>
 <555f76f7dd67c7f1678e027353d1a6a1.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <3CBDE85F.9ACFD30@san.rr.com>
 <cfd7474f6f855245ebbe8bd237d21ee1.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <3CBE0457.6E7B82A8@san.rr.com>
 <pan.2002.04.17.21.35.54.963686.16266@jps-nospam.net>
 <4519e058.0204180608.579f1e4b@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tc12-n67-188.de.inter.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: en-us
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22747
Date: 2002-04-18T22:03:37+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ted Dennison wrote:
> "Eric G. Miller" <egm2@jps-nospam.net> wrote in message news:<pan.2002.04.17.21.35.54.963686.16266@jps-nospam.net>...
> 

> For those looking for a defacto Ada GUI standard, I would say that it
> is already here with GtkAda, as much as we will ever have a standard.
> Perhaps it would help everyone to realise its "standard" status if we
> distributed it with future Gnat builds? :-)

Yes would guess so!

> 
>