From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-11 09:36:34 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.21.255.252!unlisys!news.snafu.de!boavista!nobody From: Michael Erdmann Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Development process in the Ada community Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:39:25 +0200 Organization: [Posted via] Inter.net Germany GmbH Message-ID: <3CB5BC3D.1000304@snafu.de> References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> <3CB516E1.9030008@snafu.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: tc09-n66-208.de.inter.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: en-us To: Petter Fryklund Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22368 Date: 2002-04-11T18:39:25+02:00 List-Id: Petter Fryklund wrote: > would you really have that dynamic or would you like proven stability in the > aircraft you're travelling with ;-) > I am not talking about the language, but more about the development environment, e.g. POSIX Interface, Data Base Interfaces and other components. I feel all these things have been thought about along time ago, there are some standards (Mainly MIL ..ISO) out there, but they are old and outdated. This what i mean by mssing dynamic. A more public process might lead to more publicity, more up to date standards which are maintained not only by a advocatic community like ANSI, ITU or what so ever! There for i find the idea of the JCP quite interesting and something to think about in the Ada community. Regards M.Erdmann