From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,35862b8253794e65
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-09 14:43:07 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-xfer2.newshosting.com!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3CB36065.1BC7FF6B@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 16:43:01 -0500
From: Anatoly Chernyshev <rhezusfactor@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Requeue
References: <3CB0CD37.52B43088@yahoo.com> <3CB32A54.A3A9E975@yahoo.com>
 <p9Sg2b+OOeUr@eisner.encompasserve.org> <3CB349CB.7CF3391A@yahoo.com>
 <jSIs8.1056$ai3.493549603@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 147.126.101.90
X-Original-Trace: 9 Apr 2002 15:44:13 -0700, 147.126.101.90
X-COMPLAINTS: Report abuse to abuse@mhogaming.com
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price!
 www.newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: d62470a2.news.newshosting.com
X-Trace: 
 DXC=n27H@27g:gi[aB<lo=_IRlX`1N4>^k1LciF6BbIV4YYb<QC3OD]XL_k755onmKi]@lm2lengNZCfeVM5VO4n<7Xo<Tb;cfTRHU`
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newshosting.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22287
Date: 2002-04-09T16:43:01-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Ya nye penemiyu.  I gave you a rather lengthy intro to the requeue semantics as
> well as a pointer to a good textbook dedicated to concurrency with Ada.  Others
> did as well.  The Rationale would have been a good thing for me to have
> included, and it is not the "FM", so are you complaining about someone pointing
> you to the Rationale, and, if so why?

Poimite zhe nakonec. I appreciate your efforts (frankly, no kidding) and comments of
other people and I'm not complaining a bit.
I simply issued a distracted remark (mainly in response to R. Dewar's post) meaning
that everyone could become Ada guru just pointing others to Rationale and if people
will always follow
his advice, there will be no need for CLA. Especially for periodically arisen
questions like "How to convert integer to string".
But I never expected that great programmers are so offensive.