From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ae1b1bf3750805f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-08 10:23:57 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!peer.news.opaltelecom.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed.r-kom.de!unlisys!news.snafu.de!boavista!nobody
From: Michael Erdmann <Michael.Erdmann@snafu.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Reverse Engeenering
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 19:26:42 +0200
Organization: [Posted via] Inter.net Germany GmbH
Message-ID: <3CB1D2D2.5010608@snafu.de>
References: <3cae0835$0$27054$7a628cd7@news.club-internet.fr>
 <uit75hi4e.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <rMqr8.9180$qS7.2635483358@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
 <3CB1AF02.F9B83004@despammed.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tc11-n67-119.de.inter.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: en-us
To: wesgroleau@despammed.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22234
Date: 2002-04-08T19:26:42+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

What is about ASIS? ASIS provides exaclty what you are
looking for:

http://www.adaic.org/standards/asis.html

Regards
     M.Erdmann


Wes Groleau wrote:
> 
>>>>Is anyone know a tools that can retreive object from an ada95 source code ?
>>>>
>>No, (based on the subject line given, I believe) he means "is there a reverse
>>engineering tool to be recommended that can generate object diagrams etc. from
>>Ada source code?"
>>
>>I don't recommend any because I haven't used any in a long time.  But in the
>>other direction, I like UMLStudio (www.pragsoft.com).
>>
> 
> Cadre Teamwork and Rational Rose could both do that.
> I'm not impressed with the results of either.
> 
> Rose output is better than doing the whole thing
> by hand, but you'll still do MOST of it by hand.
> 
> Teamwork was so bad, it would be BETTER to start
> from scratch, but that was more than eight years
> ago.  By now, they've probably either fixed it
> or dropped it.
> 
>